September, 2024, article in peer-reviewed journal
Science of The Total Environment

L. Gallitelli, P. Girard, U. Andriolo, M. Liro, G. Suaria, C. Martin, A.L. Lusher, K. Hancke, MCM Blettler, O. Garcia-Garin, I.E. Napper, L. Corbari, A. Cózar, C. Morales-Caselles, D. González-Fernández, J. Gasperi, T. Giarrizzo, G. Cesarini, K. De, M. Constant, P. Koutalakis, G. Gonçalves, P. Sharma, S. Gundogdu, R. Kumar, N.A. Garello, A.L.G. Camargo, K. Topouzelis, F. Galgani, S.J. Royer, G.N. Zaimes, F. Rotta, S. Lavender, V. Nava, J. Castro-Jiménez, T. Mani, R. Crosti, V.M. Azevedo-Santos, F. Bessa, R. Tramoy, M.F. Costa, C. Corbau, A. Montanari, C. Battisti and M. Scalici

  • Publication journal: Science of The Total Environment
  • Publication type: Article in peer-reviewed journal
  • Collaborators: Department of Sciences, University Roma Tre, Viale Guglielmo Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy | Biosciences Institute, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78060-900 Cuiabá, MT, Brazil | INESC Coimbra, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Polo 2, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal | Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, al. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31–120 KrakĂłw, Poland | Istituto di Scienze Marine - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, CNR-ISMAR, Pozzuolo di Lerici, La Spezia, Italy | Red Sea Research Center (RSRC) and Computational Bioscience Research Center (CBRC), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia | Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway | The National Institute of Limnology (INALI; CONICET-UNL), Ciudad Universitaria, 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina | Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain | International Marine Litter Research Unit, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK | School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK | Dipartimento di Ingegneria, UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy| Department of Biology, University Marine Research Institute INMAR, University of Cádiz and European University of the Seas SEA-EU, Puerto Real, Spain | Univ Gustave Eiffel, GERS-EE, Campus Nantes, France | Instituto de CiĂŞncias do Mar (LABOMAR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brazil | National Research Council—Water Research Institute (CNR-IRSA), Corso Tonolli 50, 28922 Verbania Pallanza, Italy | Biological Oceanography Division, CSIR- National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa 403004, India | Univ. Lille, Institut Mines-TĂ©lĂ©com, Univ. Artois, Junia, ULR 4515 - LGCgE, Laboratoire de GĂ©nie Civil et gĂ©o-Environnement, F-59000 Lille, France | Geomorphology, Edaphology and Riparian Areas Laboratory (GERi Lab), Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Science, International Hellenic University, University Campus in Drama, 66100 Drama, Greece | University of Coimbra, Department of Mathematics, Coimbra, Portugal | Department of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, School of Engineering and Technology, Nagaland University, Dimapur, Nagaland, India | Cukurova University, Department of Basic Science, Adana, TĂĽrkiye | Department of Biosystems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA | Botany and Ecology Department, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil | Department of Marine Sciences, University of Aegean, Greece | ECHOS D'OCEANS, 20217 Saint Florent, Corse, France | The Ocean Cleanup, Coolsingel 6, 3011 AD Rotterdam, the Netherlands | GERi Lab (Geomorphology, Edaphology and Riparian Area Laboratory), Democritus University of Thrace, Drama, Greece | Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy | Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Mendrisio, Switzerland | Pixalytics Ltd, Plymouth, UK | Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy | IFREMER, CCEM Contamination Chimique des Écosystèmes Marins, F-44000 Nantes, France | ISPRA, Istituto Superiore Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale, BiodiversitĂ , Roma, Italy | Faculdade Eduvale de AvarĂ©, AvarĂ©, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil | Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People & the Planet (CFE), Associate Laboratory TERRA, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal | LEESU, Univ Paris Est CrĂ©teil, Ecole Des Ponts, Creteil, France | Departamento de Oceanografia da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Arquitetura s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco CEP 50740-550, Brazil | University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy | Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Material Engineering, Via del Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy | National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), UniversitĂ  di Palermo, Piazza Marina 61, 90133 Palermo, Italy
  • Publication date: September 25, 2024
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176528

Abstract

Anthropogenic litter, such as plastic, is investigated by the global scientific community from various fields employing diverse techniques. The goal is to assess and finally mitigate the pollutants’ impacts on the natural environment. Plastic litter can accumulate in different matrices of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, impacting both biota and ecosystem functioning. Detection and quantification of macroplastics, and other litter, can be realized by jointly using visual census and remote sensing techniques. The primary objective of this research was to identify the most effective approach for monitoring macroplastic litter in riverine and marine environments through a comprehensive survey based on the experiences of the scientific community. Researchers involved in plastic pollution evaluated four litter occurrence and flux investigation methods (visual census, drone-based surveys, satellite imagery, and GPS/GNSS trackers) through a questionnaire. Traditional visual census and drone deployment were deemed as the most popular approaches among the 46 surveyed researchers, while satellite imagery and GPS/GNSS trackers received lower scores due to limited field validation and short performance ranges, respectively. On a scale from 0 to 5, visual census and drone-based surveys obtained 3.5 and 2.0, respectively, whereas satellite imagery and alternative solutions received scores lower than 1.2. Visual and drone censuses were used in high, medium and low-income countries, while satellite census and GPS/GNSS trackers were mostly used in high-income countries. This work provides an overview of the advantages and drawbacks of litter investigation techniques, contributing i) to the global harmonization of macroplastic litter monitoring and ii) providing a starting point for researchers and water managers approaching this topic. This work supports the selection and design of reliable and cost-effective monitoring approaches to mitigate the ambiguity in macroplastic data collection, contributing to the global harmonization of macroplastic litter monitoring protocols.